At the UCST, the only temperature where direct comparison between independent measurements is possible, the two available studies are in rather poor agreement: 424.2 K (Schmid et al.1) and 429.95 K (Rogalski and Stryjek2). However, it may be noted that the UCST values of Schmid et al.1 in well characterized systems are generally lower than other reports and thus the value from Rogalski and Stryjek2 is probably more realistic. The corresponding critical solution composition2 has been reported as xc1 = 0.8422, 100 w1 = 58.99.
The UCST and xc1 values2 are consistent with the values calculated in the series nitromethane - n -alkane and described in the Introduction material to this volume "Relations of Solubility Data in Binary Systems Containing Nitromethane." The numerical values on mutual solubility reported in Rogalski and Stryjek2 and Stryjek et al.3 have been approximated by the equation based on scaling law and described in the above introduction material to this volume. The following parameters have been adjusted:
(mean standard error of estimate was 0.0102).
For approximation xc1 = 0.8442 and UCST = 429.25 K (Rogalski and Stryjek2 have been used. Therefore in the opinion of the evaluators, mutual solubilities calculated by this equation may be treated as tentative (for nitromethane-rich phase at T > 393 K). These calculated results, for the selected temperatures, are presented in the following table. This relationship, together with experimental points,2,3 are also presented in Fig. 20 .
Mutual solubility of nitromethane and hexadecane
| C T (K) | D 100w1 | D x1 |
|---|---|---|
| 298.2 | 1.18 | 4.23 x 10-2 |
| 298.2 | - | - |
| 303.2 | 1.39 | 4.98 x 10-2 |
| 303.2 | - | - |
| 313.2 | 1.92 | 6.78 x 10-2 |
| 313.2 | - | - |
| 323.2 | 2.6 | 9.00 x 10-2 |
| 323.2 | - | - |
| 333.2 | 3.44 | 1.166 x 10-1 |
| 333.2 | - | - |
| 343.2 | 4.48 | 1.481 x 10-1 |
| 343.2 | - | - |
| 353.2 | 5.77 | 1.850 x 10-1 |
| 353.2 | - | - |
| 363.2 | 7.36 | 2.277 x 10-1 |
| 363.2 | - | - |
| 373.2 | 9.37 | 2.771 x 10-1 |
| 373.2 | - | - |
| 383.2 | 11.92 | 3.341 x 10-1 |
| 383.2 | - | - |
| 393.2 | 15.25 | 4.002 x 10-1 |
| 393.2 | 93.88 | 9.827 x 10-1 |
| 403.2 | 19.78 | 4.777 x 10-1 |
| 403.2 | 90.15 | 9.714 x 10-1 |
| 413.2 | 26.38 | 5.706 x 10-1 |
| 413.2 | 84.75 | 9.537 x 10-1 |
| 418.2 | 31.06 | 6.257 x 10-1 |
| 418.2 | 81.06 | 9.407 x 10-1 |
| 423.2 | 37.51 | 6.901 x 10-1 |
| 423.2 | 76.18 | 9.223 x 10-1 |
| 424.2 | 39.14 | 7.046 x 10-1 |
| 424.2 | 74.97 | 9.174 x 10-1 |
| 425.2 | 40.95 | 7.201 x 10-1 |
| 425.2 | 73.64 | 9.120 x 10-1 |
| 426.2 | 42.98 | 7.366 x 10-1 |
| 426.2 | 72.15 | 9.058 x 10-1 |
| 427.2 | 45.31 | 7.545 x 10-1 |
| 427.2 | 70.44 | 8.984 x 10-1 |
| 428.2 | 48.11 | 7.748 x 10-1 |
| 428.2 | 68.36 | 8.891 x 10-1 |
| 429.2 | 51.82 | 7.996 x 10-1 |
| 429.2 | 65.49 | 8.756 x 10-1 |
Figure
References:
1
Schmid, H. H. O.; Mangold, H. K.; Lundberg, W. O.; J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 42, 372 (1965).
2
Rogalski, M.; Stryjek, R.; Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci.; Ser. Sci. Chim. 28, 139-47 (1980).
3
Stryjek, R.; Luszczyk, M.; Fedorko-Antosik, M.; Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci.: Ser. Sci. Chim. 29, 203-211 (1981).